A forum for owners of Yamaha TTR250 trail and enduro bikes!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: BHP
Lin


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 129
Date:
BHP
Permalink  
 


Has anybody had a standard TTR250 on a dyno? I read differing power output claims from various sources.  As well, some of the "uncorking" information is just rubbish. 



__________________


Super Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1324
Date:
Permalink  
 

No, but I am very interested myself as there is a lot of bad info floating around about the HP. I would also like to Dyno mine to see what sort of increase the ''mod's'' has done. My bet is that it has raised it HEAPS!

I think that top of the list of rubbish mod's is the ''cutting the snorkel'' mod. It did nothing for performance and only made it run rich. So rich that it did not even rev past 1/2 throttle.

Of course, others may see this differently.

Jarrah



__________________

2000 TT-R250M-

Spoiler



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 168
Date:
Permalink  
 

doesn't seem to be any ttr250 dyno charts floating around on the internet.

but Brian was recently advertising silencers from Motad that were developed using his loaned bike.
the exhaust people claimed 4% power increase, so maybe they still have the dyno results to back their claim?


__________________
Lin


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 129
Date:
Permalink  
 

Yes I remember that. Any figures Brian?

__________________


Super Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 8565
Date:
Permalink  
 

OE silencer and standard header topped out at 22.6hp at 7,002 revs so that's about the figure for a dead standard TTR at the rear wheel. 

The Motad silencer and shorty front pipe topped out at 25.1hp at 7,471 revs

 



__________________

Exeter, Devon, UK

http://www.ttr250.com  - The one and only dedicated TTR250 FAQ! 
 

TIP: For easy viewing bookmark the "Recent Posts" view - http://ttr250.activeboard.com/p/recent/ 



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 168
Date:
Permalink  
 

Brian I'm guessing it was the shorty pipe that pushed the power peak up the rev range.

It is pretty weird that Yamaha specs give the standard maximum power point at a much higher 8500rpm.
I am wondering was the loan bike they used in good condition and did they do any other tuning?

It sure would be interesting to see the full chart, if available - to see what effect it had on the bottom end,
and at what RPM the torque dropped right off (and where the rev limiter cut in).
That would be handy when considering gearing options.

__________________
Lin


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 129
Date:
Permalink  
 


The MCS website claims 28hp at 8500rpm.  I'd assume thats an at the sprocket figure. Allowing minus 3% for chain losses leaves 27.16 at the wheel, a long way from 22.6 at 7000rpm (23.8 at the sprocket)

http://www.motorcyclespecs.co.za/model/yamaha/yamaha_tt250r%2000.htm

I'd have thought that despite it's skinny carb and asthmatic exhaust the TTR engine, having a narrow angle four valve pent-roof combustion chamber, 10.2:1 compression ratio, and a bore/stroke ratio of 1.22:1 would at least make 110hp/L = 27.5hp at the sprocket.  Brian's dyno test says otherwise.

 



__________________


Super Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 8565
Date:
Permalink  
 

It was a "well used" TTR on trials tyres so that may have lost some power but the comparisons are probably still fair.

I am still planning to get the 325 on a dyno to tune it up and check some airbox and exhaust combos but my upcoming Stateside trip has put that on hold!

Brian



__________________

Exeter, Devon, UK

http://www.ttr250.com  - The one and only dedicated TTR250 FAQ! 
 

TIP: For easy viewing bookmark the "Recent Posts" view - http://ttr250.activeboard.com/p/recent/ 



Super Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1156
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lin wrote:


The MCS website claims 28hp at 8500rpm.  I'd assume thats an at the sprocket figure. Allowing minus 3% for chain losses leaves 27.16 at the wheel, a long way from 22.6 at 7000rpm (23.8 at the sprocket)

http://www.motorcyclespecs.co.za/model/yamaha/yamaha_tt250r%2000.htm

I'd have thought that despite it's skinny carb and asthmatic exhaust the TTR engine, having a narrow angle four valve pent-roof combustion chamber, 10.2:1 compression ratio, and a bore/stroke ratio of 1.22:1 would at least make 110hp/L = 27.5hp at the sprocket.  Brian's dyno test says otherwise.

 


 You will most lightly find the 28hp figger is crank shaft HP... So the 22hp rear wheel works out about right

as on avarage you lose about 20% from crank to rear wheel..

primary reduction / clutch / gearbox / final reduction / mechanical drag ........ it all adds up...

oil alone sucks a increadible amount of power...



__________________

 

.....................................................................................................

 http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz

Bikes... 06 TTR250 / 09 XT660R / 1977 Montesa Cota 348 MRR / 1979 Montesa H6 125 Enduro...

E-mail  xtpete1@gmail.com

Lin


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 129
Date:
Permalink  
 

Yes petenz that would make sense. At 28bhp and allowing and 20% for mechanical losses we would see 22.4bhp at the wheel which lines up with what Brian reports.  At 3% chain loss we would see a shade over 23bhp at the sprocket.  Agree oil churning soaks up hp and contributes to heat generation.  

I guess Yamaha have used an engine dyno rig that allows direct power measurement off the crankshaft. 

 



__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 53
Date:
Permalink  
 

Did they take a before run?
the max bhp isnt the bee all when it comes to tuning,
I remap cars and the drive-ability is what surprises people, not just the higher bhp that their mates talk about,
So the tuning may bring more mid range or allow the bike to pull from lower down.

__________________

I aint no fool

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard