131Kg for a TTR & a DRZ E 250, assuming a 400 is likely to be the same...they weigh exactly the same.
As for the extras, love the photo, took me a moment to realise it was a TTR under all that. Tell us a bit more about the photo...must have become a short trip with all that on?
131Kg for a TTR & a DRZ E 250, assuming a 400 is likely to be the same...they weigh exactly the same.
As for the extras, love the photo, took me a moment to realise it was a TTR under all that. Tell us a bit more about the photo...must have become a short trip with all that on?
Mark
I got the photo from bing images,so can't tell you more sorry. I saw the article for this but can't remember where i found it. If i find it i'll let yo know.
but the oil seals on the gearbox sprocket were constantly leaking, perhaps the new ones have that fixed.
I remember reading about this problem in TBM on a test bike they had. I think the spacer that the seal ran on was plain steel which would rust and then tear the seal.
There were after market stainless ones available for the early bikes but I have a feeling that Mr Suzuki fitted spacers that didn't rust on the later bikes so the problem was (or is) cured.
Looking at the pictures of the loaded bikes reminded me of my trip in with a cooker hood and pipework and fittings to fit the kitchen sink. But not the kitchen sink, so I can't claim to have everything
-- Edited by Haggis Hunter on Thursday 13th of September 2012 09:09:00 PM
I remember riding the enduro DRZ kickstart only and the DRZ E, both of them felt physically bigger than the TTR, taller and heavier. If my memory serves me right the battery is mounted high up making the c of g feel high on a bike that already felt high. For me the DRZ was too cumbersome compared to the TTR although the DRZ engine is sweet as a nut, very linear but the oil seals on the gearbox sprocket were constantly leaking, perhaps the new ones have that fixed.